Try it / tally sheet

250767B0100

INE 2024 tally sheet, type 2

Measured on AMD: Gemma-4-31B-IT, 2026-10-16, 33.1 s, $0.000125stored read

Unused ballots: not read: blank or too faint on the page: this field goes to a person, with its photo

Gemma's read breaks one of the paper's own checks, so the gate does not accept it.

Straightened by its corner marks; the right-hand column (officials' names and signatures) is blacked out before the page is stored or sent to the model.

Watch it run

Read this sheet again, live

Gemma-4-31B-IT reads the masked page on AMD; the gate checks each field as the answer arrives.

About a minute. One live read runs at a time for the whole site; yours waits in a short queue and shows its place.

How it's checked

Gate: Routed: Unused ballots not read (blank or faint); 3 row labels not where expected

The paper's own checks

✓ rows sum to TOTAL 393 = 393

✓ votaron + representantes = section 5 393 = 393

✓ section 5 = section 7 393 = 393

✓ section 7 = TOTAL 393 = 393

✓ words = digits on every field 23 of 23

Checked against the official capture

Representatives who voted

Gemma read 3 (words 3) · official capture 393 · the paper 3

Decision on the photo: 3, the official capture does not match the paper. Confirmed by a person, blind, from the photo.

Receipt a Merkle receipt for this field in the sample audit of 300 sheets

receipt (JSON)

Checked against the official capture

Unused ballots

Gemma read blank · official capture 390 · the paper blank

Decision on the photo: blank, the official capture does not match the paper. Confirmed by a person, blind, from the photo.

Receipt a Merkle receipt for this field in the sample audit of 300 sheets

receipt (JSON)

Checked against the official capture

Voters on the list

Gemma read 390 (words 390) · official capture 3 · the paper 390

Decision on the photo: 390, the official capture does not match the paper. Confirmed by a person, blind, from the photo.

Receipt a Merkle receipt for this field in the sample audit of 300 sheets

receipt (JSON)

Separately: the official capture was wrong here

The official typed record (PREP), not Gemma's read

Representatives who voted: the official capture keyed 393; the paper says 3.

Voters on the list: the official capture keyed 3; the paper says 390.

This compares the official typed record with the paper, not Gemma's read.

Full trace: two real sheets, request to receipt · Source code

All fields (23), and other runs of this sheet

Gemma · pre-registered run

Other runs (3)

Gemma · pre-registered run Qwen3.8 · pre-registered run Qwen3.8 · pre-registered run

Gemma-4-31B-IT, pre-registered random run. sourceresults/calls_gemma_b4.jsonl Read in 33.1 s, $0.000125.

Field	Digits	Words
Unused ballots section 2	—	—	!
Voters on the list section 3	390	390	✓
Representatives who voted section 4	3	3	✓
Voters + representatives section 5	393	393	✓
Ballots taken from the boxes section 7	393	393	✓
Option 01	168	168	✓
Option 02 row 7: the printed label read is not the one expected here	62	62	!
Option 03 row 8: the printed label read is not the one expected here	4	4	!
Option 04	11	11	✓
Option 05	5	5	✓
Option 06 row 11: the printed label read is not the one expected here	17	17	!
Option 07	95	95	✓
Option 08	13	13	✓
Option 09	1	1	✓
Option 10	0	0	✓
Option 11	0	0	✓
Option 12	9	9	✓
Option 13	0	0	✓
Option 14	3	3	✓
Option 15	2	2	✓
Unregistered candidates	1	1	✓
Null votes	2	2	✓
TOTAL section 6	393	393	✓

Options 01–15 are the form's vote rows in printed order, shown without party names. Digits and words are the model's two independent readings. Official capture: the double-keyed official capture of this image (PREP). Certified: the certified district count (Cómputos), which has no section 2-5 or 7 values. Amber: the capture differs from the model. † eye-checked: the capture mis-keyed the field.

Now on 300 sheets: the sample audit